The exit paperwork is the part that goes wrong. Ending a South African medical scheme membership on aliyah is administratively simple. What it can carry is a percentage uplift on a South African contribution you might not pay for another twenty years, set by a formula that reads every year you spend insured in Israel as a year with no cover at all.
Here is the asymmetry in one line. Regulation 11 of the regulations under the Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998 defines "creditable coverage" as any period in which a late joiner was a member or dependant of a medical scheme, a member or dependant of an entity doing the business of a medical scheme which was at the time exempt from the provisions of the Act, a uniformed employee of the South African National Defence Force or a dependant of one receiving medical benefits from it, or a member or dependant of the Permanent Force Continuation Fund 1. "Medical scheme" is itself defined in section 1 of the Act as "any medical scheme registered under section 24 (1)", and section 24(1) is registration by the South African Registrar under this Act 1. All four limbs are therefore South African, and none of them reaches a foreign statutory health system. Twenty years insured under Israel's State Health Insurance Law 7 adds twenty years to your age and nothing to your coverage record. Israel prices one coverage gap and exempts an oleh under the Law of Return from it 6. Chapter 4 of the South African regulations, where both the definition and the penalty sit, contains no equivalent relief 1.
> This page explains how two separate systems interact. It is general information for olim, not tax, legal or insurance advice. Whether a particular scheme's registered rules permit continued membership from Israel, and how SARS reads your particular residency facts, are decided case by case, and a cross-border professional is the right place for both.
South Africa: who counts as a "late joiner", and why do Israeli years count for nothing?
A late joiner is an applicant, or the adult dependant of an applicant, who is 35 years of age or older at the date of application for membership or admission as a dependant, but excluding any beneficiary who enjoyed coverage with one or more medical schemes as from a date preceding 1 April 2001, without a break in coverage exceeding three consecutive months since 1 April 2001 1. Read the date carefully. The regulation says 1 April 2001 in both places, and the whole exclusion turns on it.
Two conditions have to hold together for that exclusion to protect you, and a move abroad is what breaks the second one. Cover that began before 1 April 2001 keeps you outside the definition at any age, with no expiry written into the text, right up to the day a gap runs past three consecutive months. The break is measured since 1 April 2001, so once a fourth uncovered month has passed it has passed, and nothing you do later un-measures it. The test also runs per person: an adult dependant is assessed on their own facts, so a spouse admitted to the scheme later than the main member can fall inside the definition while the member falls outside it.
The Israeli point sits in the four limbs above. Every one of them turns on cover under a South African arrangement, and the first and widest of them uses "medical scheme" in the registered-under-section-24 sense 1. On the plain text, a kupat cholim membership is not creditable coverage, so the years an oleh spends fully insured in Israel do not build the one variable that softens the penalty. Note also that the term is defined "for the purposes of this chapter" of the regulations 1. It is a South African term of art with a South African meaning, and it does not travel to, or borrow from, any other country's use of the same phrase.
South Africa: how large is the penalty, and how is the band worked out?
The penalty is a multiple of the contribution, capped by band, and the band comes from an age formula. Regulation 13(1) says a scheme "may" apply premium penalties to a late joiner, and that such penalties "must be applied only to the portion of the contribution related to the member or any adult dependant who qualifies for late joiner penalties" 1. Regulation 13(2) then says the penalties "shall not exceed the following bands":
| Penalty band (years, from the formula) | Maximum penalty |
|---|---|
| 1 to 4 years | 0.05 x contribution |
| 5 to 14 years | 0.25 x contribution |
| 15 to 24 years | 0.5 x contribution |
| 25 or more years | 0.75 x contribution |
Source: Regulation 13(2) 1. These are statutory ceilings, not tariffs. What any given scheme actually charges within them sits in its own registered rules.
The band itself comes from Regulation 13(3): A = B minus (35 + C), where A is the number of years in the first column, B is the age of the late joiner at the time of the application, and C is the number of years of creditable coverage which can be demonstrated by the late joiner 1. Mechanically, a year spent abroad without South African scheme cover adds one to B and zero to C, so A rises by one for every such year.
One detail changes C and is easy to miss. The fourth limb of the Regulation 11 definition ends "but excluding any period of coverage as a dependant under the age of 21 years" 1. On the face of the text that exclusion sits at the end of that limb, so if childhood years appear in your C, check what the scheme has actually counted rather than assuming.
Worked example 1: the ordinary case. You joined a South African scheme at 30 in 2016 and left for Israel at 40 in 2026, ending the membership on the way out. Cover began after 1 April 2001, so the pre-2001 exclusion never applied to you. You spend twenty years on a kupat cholim and apply to a South African scheme again at 60 in 2046. C is 10, because only the South African years count. A = 60 minus (35 + 10) = 15. Fifteen lands in the 15 to 24 band, so the scheme may load up to 0.5 x contribution on the portion of the contribution relating to you, and Regulation 13(5) lets that loading follow you if you later transfer to another scheme 1.
Worked example 2: the exclusion a three-month gap destroys. You have been covered continuously since 1998 with no break over three consecutive months since 1 April 2001, so today you are not a late joiner at any age. You leave at 52 in 2026 and the membership ends. Once the gap passes three months the exclusion no longer applies and cannot be rebuilt, because the regulation measures the break since 1 April 2001. You return at 67 in 2041 with C of 28 (1998 to 2026). A = 67 minus (35 + 28) = 4, which is the 1 to 4 band, up to 0.05 x contribution. The number is small, and that is not the point: had the gap never run past three months, the answer would have been no late-joiner status at all, at any age, with no expiry written into the text.
Three more provisions decide how durable this is. Regulation 13(5) says late joiner penalties "may continue to be applied upon transfer of the member or adult dependant to other medical schemes", so switching schemes later is not an exit 1. Regulation 13(4) says that where evidence of creditable coverage is produced after a penalty has been imposed, the scheme must recalculate and "apply such revised penalty from the time such evidence is provided", which is prospective on the face of the words: it fixes what you pay from then on and says nothing about what you already paid 1. Regulation 13(6) accepts a sworn affidavit setting out the relevant periods and the names of the relevant schemes, plus a declaration that reasonable efforts to obtain documentary evidence were made and were unsuccessful 1. That is a rescue, not a plan, because it asks you to establish that the reasonable efforts failed.
South Africa: which document can only your old scheme issue?
The certificate under Regulation 3(2), and it is the single most useful thing to deal with in the week the membership ends. A medical scheme must, within 30 days of the termination of membership or at any time at the request of any former member or dependant, provide that person with a certificate stating the period of cover, the type of cover, and whether or not the person qualified for late joiner status 1. Regulation 3(3) then obliges the scheme to forward a copy, on request, to any medical scheme the person subsequently applies to 1.
That certificate is your proof of C, and it is also the document that carries the late-joiner finding a later scheme will read. Ask for it in writing as part of the cancellation, while you still have a live relationship with an institution in a country you are leaving. Because Regulation 13(4) applies a revised penalty only from the time the evidence is provided, evidence reconstructed fifteen years from now protects your future contributions and speaks to nothing before that 1. Keep the certificate with your aliyah file, and keep it for life.
South Africa: what waiting periods apply on a return trip?
A separate instrument from the penalty, and it stacks on top of it. Where an applicant was not a beneficiary of a medical scheme for a period of at least 90 days preceding the date of application, section 29A(1) lets the scheme impose a general waiting period of up to three months and a condition-specific waiting period of up to 12 months 1. Someone previously a beneficiary for a continuous period of up to 24 months, terminating less than 90 days before the application, faces a condition-specific waiting period of up to 12 months except for treatment or diagnostic procedures covered within the prescribed minimum benefits, and, under section 29A(2)(b), a general or condition-specific waiting period for the unexpired duration of any waiting period the former scheme had already imposed 1. Someone with more than 24 months of continuous cover terminating less than 90 days before the application faces a general waiting period of up to three months, again except for treatment or diagnostic procedures covered within the prescribed minimum benefits 1.
One textual detail matters for olim, and it should be read as what the section says rather than as settled practice. Subsections 29A(2)(a) and 29A(3) each carry that prescribed-minimum-benefit carve-out. Subsection 29A(1), the one that catches a returning oleh who has been out of a scheme for more than 90 days, carries no such carve-out on the face of the text 1. If a scheme does require a medical report, section 29A(7) lets it ask only about a condition for which medical advice, diagnosis, care or treatment was recommended or received within the 12-month period ending on the date of the application, and Regulation 12 puts the cost of any tests or examinations required for that report on the scheme, not on you 1.
South Africa: can a scheme reprice you, or drop you, because you left?
Not on either of those grounds, on the face of the Act. Section 29(1)(n) requires the rules to provide for the determination of contributions "on the basis of income or the number of dependants or both the income and the number of dependants", and says they "shall not provide for any other grounds, including age, sex, past or present state of health" 1. Residence is not one of the two permitted grounds. Section 29(2) then says a scheme "shall not cancel or suspend a member's membership or that of any of his or her dependants" except on five listed grounds: failure to pay membership fees within the time allowed in the rules, failure to repay a debt due to the scheme, submission of fraudulent claims, committing a fraudulent act, and non-disclosure of material information 1. Living in Israel is not on that list.
Admission is governed by the same section but more loosely. Section 29(3) says a scheme "shall not provide in its rules" for the exclusion of any applicant or a dependant of an applicant from membership, "subject to the conditions as may be prescribed", except in the case of a restricted membership scheme provided for in the Act, and it also bars rules imposing waiting periods other than as provided for in section 29A 1. What none of that settles is the practical question an oleh actually has, which is whether a given scheme's registered rules contemplate a member living outside South Africa and what, if anything, they pay for care received there. Those sit in the rules themselves, so ask in writing and keep the answer.
South Africa: what happens to the tax credit and to a savings account balance?
The contribution survives the move and the tax relief does not. Section 6A(1) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 provides that "in determining the normal tax payable by any natural person there must be deducted an amount, to be known as the medical scheme fees tax credit" 4. SARS describes it as "a rebate which, in itself, is non-refundable, but which is used to reduce the normal tax a person pays", and says any portion not allowed in the current year "cannot be carried over to the next year of assessment" 3. The SARS guide's own worked example limits a credit to the remaining normal tax and footnotes that "a rebate may never create a refund" 4.
Worked example 3: the credit that stops being worth anything. A member with a spouse and two children, for the 2026 year of assessment (1 March 2025 to 28 February 2026), draws R728 a month for the member and one dependant plus R246 for each of the two additional dependants, per the SARS rate table as last updated 25 February 2026 2. That is R728 + R246 + R246 = R1,220 a month, or R14,640 across twelve months of membership. On the amounts in the same table for the 2027 year of assessment (1 March 2026 to 28 February 2027), R752 + R254 + R254 = R1,260 a month, or R15,120 2. While you are a South African taxpayer that comes off your normal tax. Once you have ceased South African residency and have no South African normal tax left to reduce, section 6A has nothing to deduct from, the excess cannot be carried forward, and the credit is worth zero. The rand contribution carries on. Section 6A(5) lets the Minister alter the amounts by Budget announcement, so read today's figure off the SARS table rather than off this page 24.
On the residency side, SARS asks a taxpayer who has ceased to be a tax resident to capture the cessation date on the RAV01 on eFiling under Income Tax Liability Details, and notes that "a case will be created whereby the taxpayer will receive a letter from SARS to submit supporting documents", after which the declaration goes in with those documents 5. A person resident by virtue of the physical presence test ceases to be a resident when physically outside the Republic for a continuous period of at least 330 full days, deemed effective from the day they left, and a deemed disposal for capital gains tax purposes takes place on worldwide assets excluding immovable property situated in South Africa when residence breaks 5. The ordinarily resident enquiry is factual and case by case; SARS's published list of factors runs to visa type, property still available in South Africa, business interests, family, social interests such as gym contracts and clubs, and return visits 5. Medical scheme membership is not on that published list, and this page does not treat it either way, which is exactly the sort of fact to put to a cross-border professional before deciding to keep a scheme running from Israel.
Two more items to close on the way out, both from Regulation 10. Where a member terminates and then either enrols in another benefit option or medical scheme without a personal medical savings account, or does not enrol in another medical scheme, Regulation 10(5) says credit balances in that savings account "must be taken as a cash benefit, subject to applicable taxation laws" 1. The regulation defers to the tax laws without stating them, so ask the scheme for the figure in writing before the membership ends, and ask a cross-border professional how the receipt is treated on both sides. And the figure may not be the whole balance: Regulation 10(3) lets the scheme use funds in a personal medical savings account to offset debt owed by the member to the scheme following that member's termination of membership, which is the one case in which the account may be drawn on for something other than the member's own health costs 1. Where you do move to another scheme or option that has such an account, Regulation 10(4) says the credit balance transfers instead of being paid out 1.
Israel: what replaces the rand contribution?
A statutory entitlement that nobody underwrites, funded by a levy on income. Under the State Health Insurance Law, effective from 1 January 1995, every Israeli resident has health insurance coverage, must be registered with one of the kupot cholim, may choose which one, and receives the standard health basket the kupah must provide as specified by law 7. Entitlement follows residency and registration, and what you pay is set by income and status rather than by risk: 3.23% (as of 1 January 2025) of income up to 60% of the average wage and 5.17% (as of 1 February 2025) above that break-point, with the 60% point stated as NIS 7,703 (as of 1 January 2026), and a person with no income from any source paying a minimum of NIS 123 (as of 1 January 2026) 8. The rand contribution you stop paying was a risk-rated premium for a benefit option; the shekel amount that replaces it is a percentage of what you earn. The mechanics of mas briut for olim sit in health tax deductions, and choosing between the kupot is covered in choosing a kupat cholim.
On the aliyah clock, a new immigrant with no income, or with income below NIS 688 (as of 1 January 2026), is exempt from health insurance contributions for six months from the day of aliyah, and for a further six months (twelve in total) where Misrad HaKlita pays subsistence benefits, on production of a subsistence benefit recipient certificate and only for the months those benefits were paid 9. Israel does price one coverage gap, for a resident who lived abroad 18 consecutive months or more without paying contributions for at least 12 months, or who lost resident status, and the waiting period can be redeemed by a special payment of NIS 16,860 (as of 1 January 2026), payable in one payment or up to six consecutive equal instalments 610. An immigrant under the Law of Return heads Bituach Leumi's list of people exempt from that waiting period altogether 6. The arithmetic of the waiting period, and who has to pay the redemption, belongs to losing your provincial health coverage on aliyah, which works it through in full. On the private side, the Israeli layer that behaves like an underwritten scheme is commercial insurance rather than the basket or shaban, the supplemental tier a kupah sells on top of the basket, which is the subject of pre-existing conditions and insurance on aliyah; the over-insurance trap that catches olim who arrive from a private-scheme country is covered in private health insurance for olim.
The treaty: does the tax convention between South Africa and Israel reach any of this?
No, and its own scope article is why. Article 2(1) of the Convention between the Republic of South Africa and the State of Israel provides that it "shall apply to taxes on income and on capital gains imposed on behalf of each Contracting State, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied". Article 2(3) lists the existing taxes covered: for Israel the income tax including company tax and tax on capital gains, the Land Appreciation Tax, and the tax on profits levied on banking institutions and insurance companies under the Value Added Tax Law; for South Africa the normal tax, the non-resident shareholders tax, the non-residents tax on interest and the undistributed profits tax. Article 2(4) extends the Convention only to identical or substantially similar taxes later imposed 11. It was published in Government Gazette No 6577 dated 13 July 1979 and entered into force on 27 May 1980 11.
That is a taxes-on-income instrument and nothing more. Its thirty articles run from Personal Scope to Termination and allocate categories of income and gains, which is why olim from South Africa read the South Africa and Israel tax treaty and the wider South African aliyah finance picture for the money side. There is no social security article among them, nothing on medical scheme membership, creditable coverage, waiting periods or health entitlement, and no mechanism by which paying Israeli health contributions could preserve a South African position 11.
If you hold a US passport, what changes?
The reporting question, and it is worth putting to someone rather than assuming. A personal medical savings account under Regulation 10 is a member-level balance, held for the exclusive benefit of the member and his or her dependants, which a registered scheme may not use to offset contributions except to settle a debt owed to it after the member terminates, and may not use to pay for a prescribed minimum benefit 1. Whether that balance, or a scheme balance generally, is a foreign financial account for FinCEN purposes is a question for a cross-border professional, and this page does not answer it either way. The separate PFIC question is not addressed here at all, and it is picked up in moving a South African share portfolio.
The general FBAR rule applies to you regardless: a US person must file FinCEN Form 114 to report a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, at least one financial account located outside the United States if the aggregate value of those foreign financial accounts exceeded $10,000 at any time during the calendar year reported. It is due 15 April following the calendar year reported, with an automatic extension to 15 October and no request needed 12. Note also the vocabulary trap: "creditable coverage" is defined in Regulation 11 for the purposes of that chapter of the South African regulations only 1, so nothing on this page speaks to any other country's use of the same phrase.
Side by side: how do the two systems price a coverage gap?
| South Africa | Israel | |
|---|---|---|
| What a gap triggers | Late-joiner status at 35 or older, unless cover from before 1 April 2001 ran without a break exceeding three consecutive months since that date 1 | A waiting period only for a resident who was abroad 18 consecutive months or more without contributions for at least 12 months, or lost resident status 6 |
| How it is priced | Up to 0.05, 0.25, 0.5 or 0.75 x the contribution, on the portion relating to that member or adult dependant, by band 1 | Loss of entitlement for up to six months, redeemable for NIS 16,860 (as of 1 January 2026) 610 |
| How long it lasts | Chapter 4 writes in no expiry, and Regulation 13(5) lets the penalty continue on transfer to another scheme 1 | Ends when the waiting period is served or redeemed 6 |
| Does foreign cover count | Only the four limbs in Regulation 11, all of them South African, count 1 | Not applicable: entitlement follows residency and registration 7 |
| Does an oleh get relief | Chapter 4 provides none 1 | An immigrant under the Law of Return is exempt from the waiting period, and contributions are waived for 6 months from the day of aliyah, or 12 with Sal Klita 69 |
Before you cancel: five checks
1. Ask your scheme in writing, as part of the cancellation, for the Regulation 3(2) certificate stating period of cover, type of cover and whether you qualified for late joiner status. The scheme must issue it within 30 days of termination, or at any time on request afterwards 1. 2. Check the date your cover began. If it began before 1 April 2001 and has never broken by more than three consecutive months since that date, you sit outside the late-joiner definition entirely today, and a gap of more than three months is what ends that 1. 3. Ask what a credit balance in a personal medical savings account will be paid out as on termination, and whether any debt to the scheme will be set off against it first 1. 4. Declare the residency change to SARS: capture the cessation date on the RAV01 on eFiling, then file the declaration with the supporting documents SARS asks for 5. 5. Register with a kupat cholim on the aliyah clock, then check your Bituach Leumi contribution status at month 6, and again at month 12 if you are drawing Sal Klita 9.
One action to take this week: send your South African scheme a written request for the Regulation 3(2) certificate, and file it with your aliyah documents. It is the only piece of evidence in this entire article that gets harder to obtain every year you are away.
Frequently asked questions
Ask your South African scheme in writing for the Regulation 3(2) certificate before the membership ends. Israeli kupat cholim years are not creditable coverage under Regulation 11, so each year abroad raises the Regulation 13(3) figure and can push a returning member into a higher penalty band, up to 0.75 times the contribution.
On the plain text, no. Regulation 11 defines creditable coverage as any period in which a late joiner was a member or dependant of a medical scheme, a member or dependant of an entity doing that business while exempt from the provisions of the Act, a uniformed employee of the South African National Defence Force or a dependant of one receiving medical benefits from it, or a member or dependant of the Permanent Force Continuation Fund. "Medical scheme" is defined in section 1 of the Act as any medical scheme registered under section 24 (1), so the widest limb is South African by definition and no limb reaches a foreign statutory health system. Israeli years therefore add nothing to C in the Regulation 13(3) formula [[1]].
No. Regulation 3(2) obliges a scheme to provide the certificate within 30 days of termination or at any time at the request of any former member or dependant, so you can still ask [[1]]. Where documentary proof genuinely cannot be obtained, Regulation 13(6) accepts a sworn affidavit setting out the relevant periods and the names of the relevant schemes, plus a declaration that reasonable efforts were made and were unsuccessful [[1]]. Bear in mind Regulation 13(4): where evidence is produced after a penalty has been imposed, the scheme recalculates and applies the revised penalty from the time the evidence is provided [[1]].
Not to child dependants. The Regulation 11 definition reaches an applicant or the adult dependant of an applicant who is 35 or older at the date of application, and Regulation 13(1) requires any penalty to be applied only to the portion of the contribution related to the member or any adult dependant who qualifies [[1]]. A spouse is assessed on their own facts, which is where a family can be split between penalised and unpenalised members.
On contributions and cancellation the Act is clear; on the practicalities it is a matter for the scheme's own rules. Section 29(1)(n) requires contributions to be determined on income or the number of dependants or both, and says the rules shall not provide for any other grounds, so residence is not a pricing ground. Section 29(2) lists the only five grounds on which a scheme may cancel or suspend membership, being non-payment of fees, an unpaid debt, fraudulent claims, a fraudulent act and non-disclosure of material information, and living abroad is not among them. Section 29(3) adds that a scheme shall not provide in its rules for the exclusion of an applicant or a dependant from membership, subject to the conditions as may be prescribed, except in a restricted membership scheme [[1]]. What the Act does not settle is what a given scheme's registered rules say about a member living outside South Africa, or what they pay for care received there, so ask in writing. Note separately that once there is no South African normal tax, the section 6A credit has nothing to reduce while the contribution continues [[3]].
Section 6A(2)(a)(ii) extends the credit to fees paid to "a fund which is registered under any similar provision contained in the laws of any other country where the medical scheme is registered", and the SARS guide adds that if a foreign fund is not regulated under legislation similar to the Medical Schemes Act it will not qualify [[4]]. No SARS ruling addressing Israeli kupot cholim or shaban plans was located, so treat this as a question for a cross-border professional rather than as a settled answer either way. For most olim it is moot in any event: the credit reduces South African normal tax, and once there is none left to reduce it is worth nothing, with no carry-over [[3]].
No. Under the State Health Insurance Law every Israeli resident has health insurance coverage once registered with a kupah [[7]], and an immigrant under the Law of Return heads Bituach Leumi's list of people exempt from the returning-resident waiting period [[6]]. On top of that, a new immigrant with no income, or with income below NIS 688 (as of 1 January 2026), is exempt from health insurance contributions for six months from the day of aliyah, and for twelve where Misrad HaKlita pays subsistence benefits [[9]].
Where you were not a beneficiary of a medical scheme for at least the 90 days preceding the application, section 29A(1) permits a general waiting period of up to three months and a condition-specific waiting period of up to 12 months [[1]]. That is a separate instrument from the late-joiner penalty and runs alongside it. Reading the section as written, the prescribed-minimum-benefit carve-out appears in subsections 29A(2)(a) and 29A(3) and not in 29A(1) [[1]].
Regulation 10(5) says that where a member terminates and then either enrols in another benefit option or medical scheme without a personal medical savings account, or does not enrol in another medical scheme, credit balances must be taken as a cash benefit, subject to applicable taxation laws [[1]]. Two qualifications matter. Regulation 10(3) lets the scheme use the funds to offset a debt you owe it following termination, so the payout can be less than the balance, and Regulation 10(4) transfers the balance rather than paying it out where the option or scheme you move to has such an account [[1]]. The regulation stops at "subject to applicable taxation laws" without stating them, so ask the scheme for the payout figure in writing and put the tax question to a cross-border professional.
No. Article 2(1) limits the Convention to taxes on income and on capital gains, Article 2(3) lists the existing taxes it covers on each side, and Article 2(4) extends it only to identical or substantially similar taxes imposed later. Its thirty articles run from Personal Scope to Termination and allocate categories of income and gains; there is no social security article among them, and nothing on medical scheme membership, creditable coverage, waiting periods or health entitlement [[11]].






