Israeli banks lend against the lower of two numbers, and only one of them is the price you negotiated. Reporting to the Supervisor Directive 876 §12, version [16] published April 2025, defines the financing ratio as the approved facility at the moment it is granted over the value of the property as the bank approved it, and then caps that value: in any event it "shall not exceed the lower of the appraiser's valuation and the cost of the property in the purchase agreement", or the expected cost for a property under construction or a purchase group 1. That definition is not left in a reporting file: Directive 329, the directive that actually limits what a bank may lend, adopts it for its own ceilings and adds that the measurement relates to the value of the purchased property alone, even where other properties are pledged for the transaction 2. Pledging a parent's flat does not raise the base. A shuma (appraisal report) that lands above your price adds nothing to that base. One that lands below it lowers the base the moment it arrives, and with it the largest loan the bank is permitted to give you.
Say precisely what that does and does not mean, because the whole page turns on it. The rule caps a ceiling, not your loan. If you were borrowing well under the limit, a shortfall may cost you only headroom. If you were borrowing at the limit, which is where a newcomer with no Israeli savings history usually sits, every shekel of shortfall converts straight into cash you have to find.
There is a second number a newcomer has to watch that a lifelong Israeli never notices. The percentage applied to that capped base comes from Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive 329, current version [13] published 30 June 2026, whose two better bands are written for a purchase by "an individual who is an Israeli citizen", with everything else falling into a residual class at the lowest ceiling 2. The shortfall is the same shortfall for everybody. The number it gets multiplied by is decided by a definition the directive writes in the language of Israeli citizenship.
> Cross-border note. This page sets out the Israeli banking rules in one set of sections and the equivalent moment under United States and England and Wales rules in another. The two systems are not coordinated, and no authority on either side reconciles them for you.
>
> No-advice note. This is educational material about published rules. It is not licensed financial, tax or legal advice, and your own classification, contract terms and eligibility turn on facts this page cannot see.
What is a shamai, and who commissions him? (Israeli treatment)
The shamai (real-estate appraiser) who values your flat for a mortgage is engaged by the bank, not by you. Directive 451 §9(c), version [22] published 19 July 2023, describes the bank approaching an appraiser to carry out a valuation and then charging the borrower its actual costs or the amount in its fee tariff, whichever is lower, and §4c(c)(2) requires the approval in principle to hand you the bank's list of appraisers working in the area where the property sits 3. You may well pay for the report. You did not choose its author, and under §10(b) the shuma is the document submitted to the bank; whether a copy reaches you is a separate rule, taken up further down 3.
The profession itself is regulated by the Real Estate Appraisers Law, 5761-2001, and the Real Estate Appraisers Council established under that law runs the qualifying examinations, registers and supervises interns, grants licences and operates a disciplinary committee 6.
Directive 451 §10(a) requires the shuma to be prepared by a certified appraiser independently of information held by the bank, and states that preparing it requires a physical visit to the property and a sketch of it. Section 10(b) requires the report to carry a detailed description of the property and the appraiser's declaration of the date of his visit 3. That visit requirement has an edge for anyone buying from abroad or off plan: someone has to open the flat to an appraiser on the bank's schedule, and the declared visit date is in the report for you to check against the week you were actually in the country.
Read that independence clause precisely, because newcomers reliably read it as something it does not say. The independence it requires is from information held by the bank. It is not independence from your transaction: Appraisal Standard 2.1 says in terms that the most suitable comparable is the subject property itself, where rights in it were sold under normal market conditions, precisely because such a transaction needs no adjustment beyond the time elapsed 4. Your own contract is evidence, not noise. A valuation that lands below it is therefore saying something specific: that the comparables he found sit lower, that he did not treat your deal as one struck under normal market conditions, or that he adjusted for something about the flat itself, of which unpermitted building work is the common one. The report has to show which.
The newcomer's real handicap is not the rule. It is that the report arrives in Hebrew, in professional appraisal language, and the reader least able to interrogate it is the one most likely to treat its number as a fact of nature rather than a document with a method, a date, and a list of comparable flats that can be checked one by one.
Why does the bank's number override the price you agreed? (Israeli treatment)
Because the directive caps the base, and the cap runs in one direction only. Directive 876 §12 sets the property value at no more than the lower of the appraiser's valuation and the contract cost 1. Three companion rules in the same directive tighten it: loan insurance is not recognised as reducing the financing ratio (§21.6); where credit is drawn in stages, as it is against a contractor's payment schedule, the ratio is computed on all approved credit including payments not yet drawn, so unused facilities count (§21.12); and additional credit later taken against the same property is recomputed against the property's current value at that date, the directive stating at §21.7.1 that as a rule granting additional credit without an up-to-date valuation is not a proper norm 1.
Two of those bite hardest on people who bought before they arrived. If you signed off plan from abroad, the cap runs against the expected cost of a property under construction rather than a finished flat you walked through 1, and every stage of the builder's schedule is measured against that same capped base 1. And a budget assembled in another currency anchors naturally on the price, because the price is the number in the contract and in your spreadsheet. The bank anchors on the lower of two numbers, one of which does not exist yet on the day you sign.
One carve-out belongs here, because it is a place where a higher valuation can do you good rather than being discarded. For a dwelling bought at a reduced price inside a state land-discount project, Directive 329 §4a permits the bank to base the property value on the appraiser's valuation at the date the loan is approved, and where that valuation exceeds ILS 2.1 million as printed in the version published 30 June 2026, on ILS 2.1 million or the purchase price, whichever is higher 2. Outside a project of that kind, the arithmetic further down is the one that applies to you.
How does the shamai actually reach a number? (Israeli treatment)
By comparison to recorded transactions, under a written standard you are entitled to read and argue with. Appraisal Standard 2.1, approved by the Real Estate Appraisers Council on 17 February 2025 and in force from 1 July 2025, gives the comparison approach as the only high-validity approach for an apartment in a multi-storey building, and requires every approach of high or medium validity to be applied unless the appraiser records in writing why it is irrelevant or impossible to apply 4. Its §4.3 then fixes the mechanics:
- Sale prices of similar rights in similar properties are the preferred comparison prices, ranked above asking prices and above values taken from other appraisals 4.
- The approach is applied on the basis of at least three relevant comparable transactions, each dated no more than two years before or after the valuation's determining date, and each similar to your flat in physical and planning characteristics and, so far as possible, located in its environment 4.
- The quantitative similarity test is that the sum of the absolute values of the adjustment rates must not exceed 35% 4.
- The single most suitable comparable is the subject flat itself, where rights in it were sold under normal market conditions 4.
- Lower-quality comparison prices, meaning asking prices, values from other appraisals, deals more than two years out and deals whose adjustments exceed 35%, may be used where fewer than three relevant transactions were found or where the appraiser considers they better ground the value conclusion, and an asking price carries a further adjustment for the negotiation discount on top of the physical and planning ones 4.
- Reliability is ranked: a price obtained in a public tender by a public body is generally more reliable than a transaction between private parties, a multi-party transaction generally ranks higher, and a comparable whose particulars were verified against a sale contract ranks above a price reported by taxpayers to the authorities, with data from a non-official source lower still 4.
That hierarchy is where a newcomer's own price intuition usually sits, and it sits near the bottom of it. The listing that anchored your offer, the flat down the street still on the market, the per-square-metre feel you imported from the city you left, are asking prices and impressions, which the standard ranks below recorded transactions and treats as a fallback carrying its own extra discount 4. If your case is that the appraiser undervalued the flat, it has to be made in his currency: closer, more recent, contract-verified deals. The separate habit of translating Israeli prices back into a home-country frame is covered in home-country price anchoring.
One further clause is worth knowing before you challenge anything. Standard 2.1 §9 permits an appraiser to depart from its instructions and recommendations, provided the nature of the departure and the reason for it are recorded in the report's principles, factors and considerations section 4. A report that does not follow the mechanics above is therefore not automatically wrong. It is a report that owes you a written reason, and that reason is the thing to read.
One trap to close before you go hunting. Appraisal Standard 19.0, on the minimum detail required in appraisals intended to offer rights in land as collateral for credit, looks like the governing standard and is not: its application clause states that it applies to appraisals for collateral for a bank, an insurance company or another credit provider, and then that it does not apply to appraisals of residential apartments prepared for obtaining a housing loan, a mortgage 5.
Which ceiling does the shortfall bite against? (Israeli treatment)
Under Directive 329, current version [13] published 30 June 2026, the ceilings are 75% for a sole dwelling, 70% for a replacement dwelling and 50% for an investment dwelling 2. That percentage is the multiplier on your shortfall, which is why the same missing shekel is not worth the same to two buyers of the same flat.
Which of the three you are in is not settled by the flat. Directive 329 §1 defines both of the better classes as a dwelling purchased by an individual who is an Israeli citizen, defines that term by reference to §16a(a), paragraphs (1) to (1b), of the Land Taxation Law, defines a nonresident as any person who is not an Israeli citizen, and makes an investment dwelling the residual class, being any residential dwelling that is neither a sole nor a replacement dwelling 2. Whether a particular buyer sits inside that citizenship definition is a question of statutory interpretation for a lawyer, and this page does not answer it. What the directive itself settles is the consequence: a purchase that does not meet the definition cannot be a sole or a replacement dwelling, so it lands in the residual class at 50% 2. The sequencing question, buying before you move against buying after, is covered in buying before you move, and the ceilings as a general topic in mortgage eligibility for olim. Documenting foreign payslips against an empty Israeli credit file is a different problem again, and it is covered in getting approved on foreign income.
One procedural consequence belongs on this page rather than on those, because it lands in the same week as the appraisal. Directive 329 §3 requires the bank, before approving a sole or replacement dwelling loan, to obtain a declaration from the applicant certified by a lawyer that he meets the conditions, and makes disbursement conditional on a copy of the declaration the applicant filed with the Israel Tax Authority under §73(c) of the Land Taxation Law, or alternatively on a purchase-tax assessment notice from which the bank can tell the two classes apart 2. Your mortgage file and your tax file are read against each other. The classification you claim has to be the same in both.
What does the gap cost you in cash?
Every shekel of shortfall costs you your own LTV percentage in extra cash, on the assumption that you were borrowing at the ceiling. The figures below are an illustration built from arithmetic, not from market data, and every number in them is a shekel number that has to exist in an Israeli account on the bank's date, not a dollar or a pound figure sitting at home.
Take an agreed price of ILS 2,000,000 and a valuation of ILS 1,880,000. The shortfall is ILS 120,000, which is 6% of the price. The base becomes ILS 1,880,000 1.
| Sole-dwelling band (75%) | Investment band (50%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum loan if the valuation had matched the price | 0.75 x 2,000,000 = 1,500,000 | 0.50 x 2,000,000 = 1,000,000 |
| Maximum loan on the capped base | 0.75 x 1,880,000 = 1,410,000 | 0.50 x 1,880,000 = 940,000 |
| Borrowing capacity lost | 90,000 (0.75 x 120,000) | 60,000 (0.50 x 120,000) |
| Cash at closing before | 2,000,000 - 1,500,000 = 500,000 | 2,000,000 - 1,000,000 = 1,000,000 |
| Cash at closing after | 2,000,000 - 1,410,000 = 590,000 | 2,000,000 - 940,000 = 1,060,000 |
| Cash as a share of the price | 25.0% rises to 29.5% | 50.0% rises to 53.0% |
Hold both readings at once. The 75% band loses 75 agorot of borrowing capacity per shekel of shortfall against 50 agorot in the 50% band, which is the reverse of the usual expectation. And the 50% band still demands vastly more cash in absolute terms, ILS 1,060,000 against ILS 590,000 on the same flat. Sitting in the lower band is not protection.
For a newcomer the right-hand column is not a hypothetical about property investors. It is the residual class that catches every purchase the directive's citizenship definitions do not reach 2, which is why the classification question is worth settling with a lawyer before you sign rather than after a valuation lands.
Does a low valuation lower your purchase tax? (Israeli treatment)
No, because the tax base is a different number, set by a different rule. Three figures can attach to the same flat on the same day:
| Whose number | What it is | What sets it |
|---|---|---|
| The bank's LTV base | The denominator of your financing ratio | Capped at the lower of the appraiser's valuation and the cost in the purchase agreement 1 |
| The appraiser's figure | Market value | At least three relevant comparable transactions within two years, adjusted, with cumulative adjustments not exceeding 35% 4 |
| The Tax Authority's figure | Shovi ha'mechira (sale value), the mas rechisha base | Generally the consideration stated in the contract, where the contract was made in writing, in good faith and without special relations between the parties, and including every amount the buyer undertook to pay directly or indirectly 8 |
Mas rechisha (purchase tax) is imposed on the buyer under §9(a) of the Land Taxation (Appreciation and Acquisition) Law, 5723-1963, as a percentage of the sale value, tiered for dwellings that will serve as a residence 8. In the illustration above the bill follows ILS 2,000,000, not ILS 1,880,000. The sale-value rule runs on the contract, not on the bank's file, so a disappointing appraisal leaves the purchase-tax bill, and the price your oleh relief brackets are measured against, exactly where they were 8.
The tax clock is also running while you argue about the appraisal, and it started earlier than most newcomers expect. Under the Israel Tax Authority's 2026 guide, updated 6 August 2026, the date of sale is generally the date the contract was signed or the date of the first written engagement, and §73(c) of the law requires the buyer to file his declaration with the manager within 30 days of the purchase date 8. The payment date is set separately, by the earliest of taking possession, paying more than 50% of the consideration, or receiving a power of attorney to register the right, and in any event not before 60 days from the transaction date 8. None of those dates is keyed to the bank's valuation; each runs from the contract or from the transaction itself 8.
The oleh relief itself runs from one year before aliyah until seven years after, is available once for an apartment and once for a business property, and is claimed on Form 2973 in front of a lawyer or a real-estate tax clerk with a Ministry of Interior registration extract proving oleh status 9. The rates and the mechanics live in mas rechisha discounts for olim and the Form 2973 guide, and they move with the index, so read them there rather than carrying a number away from this page.
What rights do you have over the report itself? (Israeli treatment)
More than most borrowers use, and all of them sit in Directive 451, version [22] published 19 July 2023:
| Right | Rule | Where |
|---|---|---|
| A copy of the shuma | Where the bank charged the borrower for the appraisal, it shall deliver him a copy of the appraisal report | §9(d) 3 |
| A capped charge | The lower of the bank's actual costs or the amount fixed in its fee tariff | §9(c) 3 |
| Charged only when needed | As a rule, only where the specific conditions attaching to that loan require an appraisal | §9(a) 3 |
| Portability, 90 days | The bank shall not unreasonably refuse a valuation you present that was made at another banking corporation's request for a housing loan, by an appraiser on the referral list you were given, no more than 90 days old; it may require direct delivery and adjustments | §9(e) 3 |
| A stated referral list | The approval in principle must carry the appraisal referral naming the appraisers the bank works with in the property's area, with an explanation of the portability right | §4c(c)(2) 3 |
| A held quote | Not less than 24 days from the date the approval in principle was given, or not less than 12 days where no new lien is needed | §4c(a)(4), §4c(g) 3 |
| A costless application | The approval in principle is given at a stage where no costs are imposed on the applicant, with a written answer within 5 business days, or 7 in exceptional cases whose characteristics are pre-defined in the bank's credit policy | §4c(a)(1), §4c(a)(5) 3 |
| No fee to secure the loan | No reservation fees and no payment for an option to receive a loan, from you, the seller, or anyone else connected to the deal | §8 3 |
Two of these are worth more to a newcomer than to anyone else. The 24-day hold is the only fixed thing in a week where nothing else is fixed, including your exchange rate and your seller's patience. And the referral list matters because it is the list against which the 90-day portability right is measured, so §9(e)'s protection does not reach a valuation you obtained through a different route, however recent and however professional 3.
Note what §9(d) is and is not. It is an entitlement conditional on having been charged. The one place the directive requires an appraisal right to be explained to you in writing is §4c(c)(2), and the right it names there is §9(e), the portability right, not §9(d) 3. If you were charged, ask.
No fee figure appears in this section on purpose. The directive gives a rule, the lower of actual cost or tariff, and publishes no price 3.
What would this moment have looked like at home? (Home-country treatment)
Two protections newcomers assume are automatic are creatures of specific home-country rules.
United States. Under 12 CFR 1002.14(a)(1), Regulation B, a creditor shall provide the applicant a copy of all appraisals and other written valuations developed in connection with an application for credit secured by a first lien on a dwelling, promptly on completion or three business days before consummation, whichever is earlier; the applicant may waive that timing, but the waiver goes to timing and the copies must still be provided 10. Paragraph (a)(2) requires written notice of the right no later than the third business day after the creditor receives the application, (a)(3) forbids charging for the copy while permitting a reasonable fee to reimburse the cost of the appraisal itself, and (a)(4) applies the requirement whether credit is extended or denied and to incomplete or withdrawn applications 10. Set that against the Israeli rights table above: an American oleh who waits for the report to arrive by itself is waiting on a rule that does not follow him here.
England and Wales. GOV.UK's guidance for buyers states flatly that "an offer is not legally binding until contracts are exchanged", and that the guide covers England and Wales, with different rules for Scotland and for Northern Ireland 12. Its conveyancing page describes the moment things change: when buyer and seller are both happy with the contract, both sides sign final copies and send them to each other, "the agreement to sell and buy is legally binding once this happens", and usually neither side can pull out without paying compensation 11. Everything before exchange is free to collapse, which is exactly why a lender down-valuation reads at home as a renegotiation rather than a crisis.
In Israel the same signature is already the event that starts a statutory clock, as the Israeli sections above set out: the sale date generally follows the contract signature and §73(c) runs 30 days from it 8. Whether, and on what terms, you can withdraw after signing is set by the contract you signed, and is a question for your own lawyer rather than a general rule this page can supply. A financing or valuation condition, a tnai matleh (condition precedent), is a term that has to be in the chozeh (purchase contract) itself; the contract protections are set out in unpermitted additions and buyer risk.
Elsewhere. Whatever the survey, valuation and conveyancing sequence is in the country you are coming from, do not assume it maps onto the Israeli one. Two things are worth establishing before you sign anything: what your signature commits you to, and whose number sets the loan.
What does neither system coordinate?
The shortfall is a shekel obligation on an Israeli regulatory clock, paid out of money that is usually still abroad. Your ishur ekroni (approval in principle) holds its terms for a period the bank sets, which must not be less than 24 days from the date it was given and must be stated prominently in the document, under Directive 451 §4c(a)(4), version [22] published 19 July 2023 3. Someone closing a gap out of an existing shekel account has a cash-flow problem. You have a cash-flow problem, a conversion problem and a documentation problem inside the same window, at whatever rate the day gives. The currency mechanics are covered in paying a dollar down payment on a shekel apartment and the currency gain on a shekel mortgage, and money arriving from family in gifted down payments from abroad.
One reporting consequence deserves a single sentence. A US person must file an FBAR, FinCEN Form 114, where the aggregate value of foreign financial accounts exceeded USD 10,000 at any time during the calendar year, due 15 April with an automatic extension to 15 October and filed electronically through FinCEN's BSA E-Filing System rather than with the federal tax return, per IRS guidance as last reviewed 30 July 2026 13. A single larger gap payment sitting briefly in an Israeli account can cross that line on its own.
US tax treatment of pooled investments, including PFIC, is covered separately in the PFIC problem for American olim. This article is about mortgage collateral only, and no pooled vehicle appears on it.
What can you actually do about a low valuation?
Work the report before you work the price, in this order.
1. Get the report. If the bank charged you for the appraisal it must hand you a copy 3. Ask for it by name: he'etek mi'doch ha'shuma. If Hebrew is not yet a reading language for you, get it in front of someone who reads it professionally on the same day, because the clock in step 6 is already running. 2. Check the mechanics before the number. A certified appraiser, a stated date of the physical visit, a sketch of the property, a detailed description. All four are required, and the report is supposed to have been prepared independently of what the bank already knew 3. 3. Go to the comparables. Look for at least three relevant transactions inside two years, similar in physical and planning characteristics, cumulative adjustments not exceeding 35%, and transaction prices rather than asking prices 4. Where the report relies on asking prices or on deals outside those bounds, the standard expects a stated reason, either that fewer than three relevant transactions were found or that the appraiser judged the fallback better grounds the conclusion, and any departure from the standard has to be recorded with its reason 4. Ask which it was. That is a documented question, not a difference of taste. 4. Bring better comparables. Under the standard's own ranking, a comparable verified against a sale contract outranks a price reported by taxpayers to the authorities, and both outrank an asking price 4. Recorded transaction data is published by the state through its nadlan portal. If Hebrew and Israeli block-and-parcel numbering are not yet familiar ground, this is the step to hand to your lawyer or to a privately engaged appraiser. Three closer, more recent, contract-verified deals are a stronger move than disputing the conclusion. 5. Use the 90-day portability right if you already hold a valuation obtained at another bank's request, by an appraiser on the referral list you were given 3. 6. Watch the clock without panicking to it. Your approval in principle holds its terms for at least 24 days 3. That is the window for renegotiating the price with the seller, and it is also the window in which foreign money has to actually land. 7. Do not go looking for a shamai machria. The decisive appraiser is an institution of the Planning and Building Law, 5725-1965, operated by the Ministry of Justice's professions regulation division, which appoints decisive and advisory appraisers, monitors their performance and publishes their decisions 7. That remit is planning disputes, not a bank's mortgage valuation, and hunting for one costs weeks you do not have.
Unpermitted building work is one common reason a valuation lands low, and it carries its own document checks and contract protections in unpermitted additions and buyer risk. The sequence of the transaction as a whole is set out in the Israeli buying process.
Next step: before you sign a chozeh, read mortgage eligibility for olim and settle which Directive 329 band your purchase falls into, because that percentage is what turns an appraisal shortfall into a cash number.
Frequently asked questions
An Israeli bank's loan-to-value base is capped at the lower of the appraiser's valuation and your contract price, so a low shuma lowers the largest loan available and costs cash if you were borrowing at the ceiling. It does not lower purchase tax, which runs on the sale value. Which Directive 329 band applies is a citizenship question.
No. Reporting to the Supervisor Directive 876 §12, version 16 published April 2025, caps the property value at the lower of the appraiser's valuation and the cost in the purchase agreement, so a valuation above your price changes nothing. The cap only ever works against you, which is why a high valuation is not worth chasing. The one carve-out is a dwelling bought at a reduced price inside a state land-discount project, where Directive 329 §4a, current version published 30 June 2026, lets the bank base the value on the appraisal at approval, and where that appraisal exceeds ILS 2.1 million as printed in that version, on ILS 2.1 million or the purchase price, whichever is higher.
No. Directive 876 §12 caps the value of the property, which caps the maximum loan the loan-to-value ceiling allows. If you were asking for less than that maximum, a shortfall may cost you only headroom. If you were borrowing at the ceiling, which is the common position for a newcomer without an Israeli savings history, the whole shortfall converts into cash at your own LTV percentage: 75 agorot in the shekel in the sole-dwelling band, 50 agorot in the investment band.
Where the bank charged you for it. Directive 451 §9(d), version 22 published 19 July 2023, says that where the bank charged the borrower for the appraisal it shall deliver him a copy of the appraisal report. The entitlement is conditional on having been charged, and the one appraisal right the directive requires the bank to explain to you in writing is §9(e), the portability right, under §4c(c)(2). If you were charged, ask for it by name: he'etek mi'doch ha'shuma. Olim from the United States often expect it to arrive automatically, because Regulation B works that way at home.
Sometimes. Directive 451 §9(e), version 22 published 19 July 2023, says a bank shall not unreasonably refuse a valuation you present, provided it was made at the request of another banking corporation for a housing loan, the appraiser appears on the referral list you were given, and no more than 90 days have passed since the valuation date. The bank may still require the appraiser to send it directly and may require adjustments. A valuation obtained through some other route falls outside that protection.
No. Purchase tax is imposed on the buyer under §9(a) of the Land Taxation (Appreciation and Acquisition) Law, 5723-1963, as a percentage of the sale value, and the Israel Tax Authority's 2026 guide, updated 6 August 2026, says the sale value generally follows the consideration stated in the contract where the contract was made in writing, in good faith and without special relations between the parties. Your bill follows the price you agreed, not the bank's number, and the oleh relief brackets are measured against the same price.
At least 24 days from the date your approval in principle was given. Directive 451 §4c(a)(4), version 22 published 19 July 2023, requires the bank to set a reasonable period for producing the documents needed to verify the data, during which you can take the loan on the same terms, and states that this period shall not be less than 24 days and must be stated prominently in the approval itself. Where no new lien is needed, §4c(g) sets a floor of 12 days.
No. The shamai machria, or decisive appraiser, is an institution of the Planning and Building Law, 5725-1965, operated by the Ministry of Justice's professions regulation division, which receives applications to appoint decisive and advisory appraisers, monitors their performance and publishes their decisions. That remit is planning disputes, not a bank's mortgage valuation. Your leverage is the report's own method under Appraisal Standard 2.1, the portability right in Directive 451 §9(e), and the price negotiation with the seller.
Directive 329, current version published 30 June 2026, writes its sole-dwelling and replacement-dwelling bands for a purchase by an individual who is an Israeli citizen, defines that term by reference to §16a(a), paragraphs (1) to (1b), of the Land Taxation Law, and defines a nonresident as any person who is not an Israeli citizen. The consequence the directive itself settles is that a purchase not meeting the definition cannot be a sole or replacement dwelling and therefore sits in the residual investment class at 50%. Whether your own status meets it is a question of statutory interpretation for a lawyer, and this page does not answer it. The sequencing is covered in the Meidahon article on buying before you move.
You may be charged, but only within limits, and no honest price can be quoted here. Directive 451 §9(a) says that as a rule there is room to charge a borrower for appraisal costs only where the specific conditions attaching to that loan require an appraisal, and §9(c) caps the charge at the lower of the bank's actual costs or the amount fixed in its fee tariff. No primary source publishes a standing figure, so treat any number you are quoted as something to check against that rule.
Because Appraisal Standard 2.1, in force from 1 July 2025, ranks them that way. Sale prices of similar rights in similar properties are the preferred comparison prices, ahead of asking prices and ahead of values taken from other appraisals, and an asking price carries a further adjustment for the negotiation discount on top of the physical and planning ones. The standard also treats the subject flat's own recent sale under normal market conditions as the single most suitable comparable. If you want to move the number, the evidence that counts is recorded, contract-verified deals close to your flat inside the two-year window.